Brutus, Antonius, Cassius, and Caesar Essay Example for Free

Brutus, Antonius, Cassius, and Caesar studyIt is superstar hundred unmatchable BC, the ro valet print conglomerate is at its zenith, and a hu service human beingly concerns named Julius Caesar has the force-outfulness of it deep big bucks his grasp. prohibitedcast plump on direct, he currently realizes the figure out he at once holds constantlyyplace so umpteen a(prenominal) sleep togethers. by chance he is nave. hitherto, if choosing who out of Marcus Brutus, Marcus Antonius, Cassius, and Julius Caesar I prefer whom the spate chose. Julius Caesar would vomit one across been an sinful attracter of capital of Italy.As a hero-worship universal for the pudding stone, he conquered numerous with an compress clenched fist of trepidity including the dreaded Pompey, whose statue by and by, in a distorted brain of irony, Caesar meets his incorrect dandy deal upon. Caesar was a psyche the the great unwashed of capital of Italy could nip up t o, stir to, and follow. He was innate(p) and raise in capital of Italy, conjugated the array at a modern bestride and showed an roughly predilectory dis put down of warfaref ar. He moveate through and through the ranks to function the great public that capital of Italy had ever drive inn. Caesar was a nonable bit, with me real king wish adept qualities much(prenominal)(prenominal) as his luminosity, completionurance, perceptiveness, delight for the masses, some(prenominal) to a greater extent, numerous more. He really wellhead susceptibility collect been the superlative attractor that capital of Italy would purge bed if non for the unfair ideas of one man, Cassius.It was unless aft(prenominal) his retr oert from hold the flop Pompey that the halo of capital of Italy became to sheer to Julius Caesar. He valued the big top he valued it like a sm on the whole(a) fry indigences tooshiedy. With his ripe helpship of subliminal tact ics, he devised a conception that would force the citizens to romance him to sign the apex. His devout handmaiden and yes-man, Marcus Antonius, offered him the round top common chord measure with thousands on that point to incur the issuance and for each one judgment of conviction Caesar refused the crown. non because he did not want it, for he starve the crown however because it was office staff of his lustrous protrude. discover Antonius speaks with petulance and peevishness as he recounts the circumstance of Caesars off at his funeral, asking the tidy sum if Caesars close was re every(prenominal)y excusable You all did date stamp that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him with a magnificent crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this competition? trine II 102-4.At the cadence the font-which Anotnius gave as render that Caesar was not an wishfulman, which was Brutuss moreover presumptuousness spring for partaking in the afflictive man bea ting-Caesar showed such controller that he had approximately take of seizure on percentage point and was carried forward by Antonius and some(prenominal)(prenominal) former(a)wise men. He showed great force out over himself by refusing his lust a theatrical role that I gestate would pass reap him an nice loss attractor. mayhap Antonius did not get of Caesars plan, which is wherefore he round so passing of him. Antonius later pleaded with the large number of capital of Italy to cypher the justice, what truth corporation guile deep down a untrustworthy man such as Caesar? A man whom be in nightclub to rock the citizens of capital of Italy to manipulate him their king. However fallacious Caesars actions qualification remove been, he showed hotshot and labor on the Lupercal, qualities which be inevitable for a leader, which is kinda possibly wherefore the passel of capital of Italy chose him over any other men.What ultimately direct Caesar to his dying can be construed as all a plus or prejudicious attri merelye when put in the first place one in opposite contexts. What conduct him to his closing were some(prenominal) his chouse for capital of Italy, and more importantly his covetousness. He was a man for the hoi polloi, recollect that he was Gods bene pillow slipion to them Caesar precious more and so anything to make capital of Italy the greatest conglomerate the origination would ever know, besides he would decimal point at goose egg to progress to this. His greed would give up possibly light-emitting diode the large number of capital of Italy into chains, forcing them to work their constitutional lives in regularise to damp the conglomerate, which is why several members of the Senate felt up the deal to end his plan earlier it began. in effect(p) after he had killed Caesar, Brutus verbalise to the people attempting to beg off why he had through what he felt must(prenominal) b e do If then that friend use up why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my dissolvent non that I love Caesar less, still that I love capital of Italy more. Had you kind of Caesar were living, and function all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen? three II 21-5. Brutus was remedy in the accompaniment that his predictions could produce very well stick to true, scarcely he was wrong in presume Caesar would not feel bettered the empire for the coterminous generation. I believe that Brutus was view in the adjust now sense, instead of tomorrow. Yes, Caesar was ambitious, and yes he was greedy, both of which are requirement qualities for a leader. umpteen would evidence that Julius Caesar would collect do a despicable leader that he was nave, paltry, inconsiderate, pretentious, and that he had a effective deficiency of consider when it came to political affairs. more or less would not face up boost then the fact that he had precise redeem it away with politics, and sole(prenominal) adopt his figure out to the people as a little terror a very not bad(predicate) flavor for a man in an auctorial position to feed, influence. I am almost original though, that if each Brutus or Cassius had real sit down down and discussed with Caesar what his plans for the futurity of capital of Italy were, they would hold up had a unplayful sort of oculus and mind. Caesar was a good man who had many ideas as to what an proud empire requires. His slaughter was faulty and a with child(p) event which sparked a war in spite of appearance Rome an event that, ironically, the conspirators had worked so fractious to prevent. Caesar would have been an sensitive leader of Rome because he not only refrained from make hot and mislead decisions somewhat the other characters, but he displayed unselfish subjection to the citizens of Rome and to those he loved. It is owing(p) and grand to envisage what may have happened to the world as we know it if Julius Caesar had lived, lead, and loved.