my life ant its ways :: essays research papers

My Thinking and its WaysA utopia is a place of ideal perfection oddly in laws, government, and social conditions. When I sit to think I think of my own utopia. I dream of things that I could not do the normal piece plainly in my own utopia. In my utopia a key phrase and motto is dont worry. I want to have no worries in what I do, think, feel, and every other aspect that would worry round. In my utopia, I am the utopia.I am the one and only in my adult male. come-on to do things and the will to not do things is what separate the strong and the weak. I feel and many others may disagree when I say that everyone will refund to regulateation. I am not a perfect individual and many others are not either and if you think your perfect certainly you are to pernickety to be perfect. So in my world I like to be by myself. How croupe one be tempted if there is no one to tempt him? A main reason for me to be by myself is so I can live in a world without temptation. I know I am not a we ak person but I am not the strongest and I fall to temptation. I think that I could do everything by myself. I think that I can depend on myself and no one else. I know in a real world this could not happen that you cannot make it by yourself, but in mine you can make it by yourself because you are the one that makes it. No one can challenge you and it is not necessary to not challenge anyone else. Life is hard and harsh place to be so to be somewhere else would be a dream.Being alone would not bother me I would be able to do it. Sometimes I love being myself just thinking about this little world that I could live in and do things my way. You may think being by yourself would be dull because there is no impact, but when your alone you can think of the most imaginative places and scenarios. From reading this you might think that I am an anti-social person, but I am not one. I love the people around me but when you dream and think you can do things you cant do on earth or in reality.

Motivation and Manipulation in Julius Caesar Essay -- William Shakespe

In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare illuminates the themes of human motivation and manipulation. He examines the relationship between actions and motivations, cause and effect, and word and deed, using the symbols of turn over and hearts. Throughout the play, the characters Brutus and Marc Antony express their different understandings of this relationship rhetorically. In his 1953 film interpretation, Joseph L. Mankiewicz demonstrates these characters understanding through both the plays original dialogue and his own interpolated action. It is kindle to see the different effects of spoken rhetoric, as we experience it in the play, and the visual rhetoric of the film. The play itself complicates matters of motivation and therefore does not answer the dubiousness of blame. When reading one character, the audition feels connected with their point of view, and when reading the other, they are made to feel unsure about their initial opinion. In the end, it is nearly infeasible to discover the characters inner motives, and it is therefore difficult to place blame on one or the other. However, Mankiewicz visually presents the complex relationship between these two symbols and in doing so, he creates a more sympathetic persona for Brutus than the one in the play. He focuses on the men as a symbol of unity, love, and friendship, and where characters use hands for evil acts, he is quick to juxtapose the actions of hands from the motivations of the heart. While Shakespeare uses this juxtaposition to merely complicate the matter without solving it, Mankiewicz uses it to simplify the question. For Mankiewicz, Brutus involvement in the kill of Caesar, does not wholly reflect his character, and the audience is made to see a more human, vulne... ...wn in the play. In Brutus words, Th abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power, and in that instance, the film shows Antonys abuse of authority (2.1.18-19). Because Antony believes that the hands actions and the he arts motivations cannot be separated, his language demonstrates this belief, and he acts accordingly. While Brutus may act maliciously at times, he believes that hands and hearts are not always inextricably linked and therefore, that is especially true of his evil actions. Though Shakespeare may the leave the audience in doubt, Mankiewicz does not avoid blame and suggests that the exclusive joining of hands and hearts disjoins compassion from power and leads to true butchery. Works CitedMankiewicz, Joseph L., dir. Julius Caesar. 1953. Film Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. New York Barnes & Noble, 2007. Print.